Public to weigh in on changes to sign ordinance
by Kristal Dixon
kdixon@cherokeetribune.com
June 29, 2011 12:00 AM | 1528 views | 4 4 comments | 4 4 recommendations | email to a friend | print
‘Bandit signs’ like this would be prohibited under Woodstock's revised sign ordinance.<br>Cherokee Tribune/Samantha M. Shal
‘Bandit signs’ like this would be prohibited under Woodstock's revised sign ordinance.
Cherokee Tribune/Samantha M. Shal
slideshow
WOODSTOCK — The city of Woodstock is looking for public input before it moves forward with proposed changes to its sign ordinance.

The city will host meetings with business owners and interested parties to review the proposed changes beginning today. Today’s meetings will be at 8 a.m., 10 a.m., 5 p.m. and 7 p.m. at the Chambers at City Center in downtown.

The Woodstock Planning Commission during its July 6 meeting will consider the amendments at 7 p.m. at City Hall Annex.

The first reading of the changes will be held at 7 p.m. July 25 at the chambers and the second reading is set for 7 p.m. Aug. 8.

The proposed changes can be viewed at www.wood

stockga.gov/DocumentView

.aspx?DID=1445.

If approved, the changes would ban so-called “bandit signs.”

Bandit signs are typically placed in city-owned right-of-way and are designed to get the attention of passing traffic.

They are usually between 18 and 24 inches in size and advertise a wide variety of things such as dating services, landscaping and home repair.

The city has had a long-term goal of cracking down on these signs. Back in 2007, the city mulled fining companies that placed these signs in the right-of-way.

City Attorney Susan Stuart presented the proposed changes to the City Council during its meeting on June 20. She noted the city needed more “flesh” in the ordinance.

Community Development Director Richard McLeod also said the city will be making legal modifications to its ordinance, mainly making sure the city’s ordinance is content neutral, meaning it does not pick and choose which signs to regulate.

He noted government or city-sponsored signs would no longer be exempt from the city’s regulations.

The ordinance would also regulate the size, height, number and spacing of signs, signs on buildings, freestanding signs, sign material and lays out the process of getting sign permits.

Woodstock code enforcement officers will be on hand today during the meetings to answer questions from participants, McLeod.

The proposed changes, he said, will now give the city some teeth in its attempts to regulate the number and quality of signs along its roads and streets.

“We want everyone’s message to be effective, but we want to maintain a sense of aesthetics,” he said, adding the city also needs to make sure it does not limit any one’s right to free speech protected under the First Amendment.

Lee West, a downtown business owner that has reached out to the city to provide input on past attempts at overhauling the sign ordinance, said he’s looking forward to reviewing the proposed changes and providing feedback.

West applauds the city’s efforts to reach out to business owners.

West also said he understands the city perspective of balancing a business’s right to advertise their services with their desire to avoid cluttering right-of-way with numerous, unattractive signs.

“But it can’t be so restrictive that it limits free speech,” he added of the city’s ordinance.
Comments
(4)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
Tomato Stake
|
July 01, 2011
LOL... Funny. I picked up forty two of those very same "Junk Cars" signs down in Cobb County today! That idiot gets around and has been a particular project of mine....

It's litter, Cherokee! A blight, just like anywhere else!
anonymous
|
July 01, 2011
I don't mind the signs. I have had great luck hiring local contractors from this type of advertisement. It lets me know they are local and eagar to work. Also, a neighbor of mine sold an eyesore of a car to someone with these signs. I was glad the car was gone, so the signs are fine with me.
NO STREET SPAM
|
June 30, 2011
Hope the city can get this done and enforced.

As for the bandit signs, I call it Street Spam. The signs should be outlawed. Should be pretty easy to enforce... They give you their contact information on the sign. Article 11 of the Cherokee County Zoning Ordinance prohibits "Snipe Signs" but it doesn't look like it is enforced. If they did enforce it it's a revenue generator. Article 19 allows for a civil penalty not to exceed $1000 per day per violation. That cures the budget crunch. Is anyone at the county listening?

Tomato Stake
|
June 30, 2011
Your county just looks like a trashy tag sale going on. Converting the public ROW to private use is illegal. Pick up your litter cherokee!
*We welcome your comments on the stories and issues of the day and seek to provide a forum for the community to voice opinions. All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website but are not edited. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, spam, and links to outside websites will also be rejected. Please read our terms of service for full guides