Bryan not backing down from senior homestead exemption proposal
by Kristal Dixon
kdixon@cherokeetribune.com
February 03, 2012 12:05 AM | 34678 views | 8 8 comments | 5 5 recommendations | email to a friend | print
CANTON — A Canton City Councilman who called for a referendum to be placed on the ballot to reconsider the city’s senior homestead exemption is standing by his assertion.

Bill Bryan, who made the motion to call for a referendum during the City Council’s Jan. 26 meeting, said it is time for the city to begin exploring options to shore up its dwindling revenue.

The exemption, he said, was put into place through a referendum a number of years ago when the economic times were different.

“I don’t think anyone realized the impact that such an exemption would have on our city’s finances,” he said.

Canton grants a $112,000 exemption on property for seniors age 62 or older. The person receiving the exemption must reside in the home.

Along with Canton, Holly Springs and Woodstock offer senior homestead exemptions for those 62 years or older.

In the state of Georgia, homes are appraised at fair market value, but are assessed at 40 percent of that appraised value.

For example, a senior in Canton who owns a home valued at $300,000, assessed at 40 percent, or $120,000, would have the $112,000 homestead exemption applied, which would leave the property with $8,000 that can be taxed.

The city would then calculate the taxable portion with its 6.80 millage rate, resulting in the homeowner having a $54 tax bill.

As property values decline, some homeowners end up paying no property taxes.

Bryan contends those receiving the exemption aren’t the ones who benefit from it.

“We need to look at the ones who really need help, the ones living month to month, hand to mouth in rental properties,” he said. “That’s one of the reasons why I’m proposing to let voters decide. It’s not accomplishing anything worthwhile.”

Bryan said in 2011, 1,231 homes in the city limits either paid no property taxes or paid a “disproportionately small amount.”

Three years ago, he noted that number was close to 1,500 and an additional 102 homes have applied for the exemption just in 2012.

The councilman said that exemption has cost taxpayers $601,043 and the city’s revenue has dropped by 22.5 percent last year.

Bryan said he’s merely pointing out these details because his “sworn responsibility is to represent all of the citizens of Canton.”

“I don’t want to come across with a person with a vendetta, he said. “I’m just doing my job. I pointed out a gigantic hole in the public treasury and a way to fix it.”

Bryan’s proposal last week drew several comments in opposition, including comments from Mayor Gene Hobgood and other council members.

Hobgood said the city just needs to “tighten our belts” and “we will be okay.”

He added it wasn’t in the best interest of the city to take away something that’s been in place for years.

“It’s very clear that if we didn’t like, it shouldn’t have been given,” he said “It’s a good thing for seniors and they do contribute to the community quite a bit.”

Councilman Glen Cummins agreed, adding the elimination would “discourage seniors from moving to the city.”

Councilman John Beresford said Bryan was more willing to point out the money being lost with the exemption, but ignores the city’s roughly $30 million debt related to the Hickory Log Creek Reservoir.

“There’s other ways to approach our financial situation,” he said. “He’s really grasping for straws. I’m very disappointed in his actions. I’m disappointed in his thought process.”

Councilman Jack Goodwin said he also disagrees with Bryan, adding many seniors have worked very hard to get where they are and many in the city are on fixed incomes.

“What little we give them in benefits, I think most of them put it back in the community,” he added.

Bryan contests the fact that seniors will stop moving to Canton if the exemption is altered or revoked.

He also said there is no way to prove the arguments some made last week that seniors spend more of their per capita income inside the city than the younger generations.

Bryan also “responsible homeownership” brings the responsibility of paying for municipal services one receives.

He also said he wasn’t sure where the city could cut any more expenses and “continue to exist as a city.”

“I’m not disrespectful towards senior citizens that have worked hard, but (they) have not worked hard to get a free ride at the expense from the rest of us,” he said.

Councilman Bob Rush said he can see where his fellow elected official is coming from, but added “he’s pushing it a little too hard.”

Rush said the city could explore lowering the exemption because of the fact that property values have declined.

Councilman Hooky Huffman also said Bryan brought up valid points, but he noted he would not be in favor of eliminating the exemption.

Huffman did say the age of 62 as the standard was established years ago and many seniors continue to work and live past the age of 62, so it wouldn’t hurt to examine reviewing the age.

If any changes were go to in effect, Huffman said he would support current citizens receiving the exemption being grandfathered in so they would not be affected by any changes.

“This would not render the city near the amount of savings that Mr. Bryan initially proposed, but over several years, it will help close the gap,” he said.
Comments
(8)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
Voice of Reason
|
February 03, 2012
I am appalled at the disrepectfulness geared toward our senior population. In addition, you talk about a real estate market becoming even more flooded! The elimination of the senior exemption would create a mass exodus from the city of Canton, creating a wind rush which would be felt throughout Cherokee County and North Georgia. The values of all city properties would go through the floor faster than the free fall ride at Six Flags. The new nickname for Canton would become Ghost Town GA. Some people need to start using their heads for more than a hat rack and not even think of "pulling the rug" out from under our senior citizens. One thing I have learned in life is that you don't pick on children and old people. It will "do you in" every time.
Bill Bryan
|
February 07, 2012
My job is to represent all citizens, not certain, specific groups. Using facts and proven data, I clearly pointed out a disturbing trend of decreasing revenues and increasing households receiving municipal services paid for by others. Ten years ago the senior exemption was voted in by the citizens in a referendum. Before that, ALL households paid their fair share. Economic times have changed drastically since then. Why not let the citizens either reaffirm the exemption or vote it out?

Mark my word, very soon the majority of the Canton City Council will be hitting the taxpayers with a tax increase. The irony is that three of the seven pay zero taxes. A tax increase will have zero affect on them. Two others pay a very tiny amount of property taxes and an increase will have a very minimum affect on them. Ironic isn't it?

PolecatMtn
|
February 03, 2012
@abou time,

Calling me stupid is not a solution to a problem. It is apparent that you have a problem with those of us who are older than you. May I suggest you leave your mother's basement and get a job. After all one cannot stay at home playing video games when one is 30 years old forever.
Kristen Jones
|
February 03, 2012
It is that simple we either generate more revenue and get rid of the debt, by taxing families at a higher rate, or we merge with the county and after the merge continue to pay and get rid of the debt. Debt has to be paid. However, making Canton a tax haven for seniors and asking cash straped residents for more just so we can service seniors and pay down debt is WRONG! There is talk of merging fire and water services, what would we be left with, police? If my child goes missing I want the county to respond.
senior moment
|
February 03, 2012
Councilman Bryan, once again, is off his rocker. He brought this up for a vote at the last meeting and was defeated 5-1. Does he not know what no means? We seniors have contributed to Canton in many ways, and we should not have our limited exemptions taken away when there are so many other areas to be addressed. First he wants to punish senior citizens, then he wants to dissolve the city? What is wrong with this guy?
oldandgray
|
February 03, 2012
How will eliminating the senior exemption help those living month to month and hand to mouth renters? Since when has Mr. Bryan cared about them, maybe since this exemption became an issue? Some of those people are seniors too so why not help them now Mr. Bryan, Why wait?
PolecatMtn
|
February 03, 2012
You cannot tax your way out of a problem. The Politicians got Canton into this mess and they want the "easy" way out. Canton and the other small cities in the County need to merge with Cherokee County. Merging resources and seeking efficiencies works in a lot of merged city & county's across the country.
about time
|
February 03, 2012
Every municipality, county, and state in the country is facing a hardship as a result of the recession. So to say that "Politicians got Canton into this mess" is naive and stupid. I think everyone needs to pay their share. Is there something magical about turning 62 that makes you more important than everyone else? You can check your Constitution, but last time I looked I saw nothing about additional rights/freedoms for 62 year olds.
*We welcome your comments on the stories and issues of the day and seek to provide a forum for the community to voice opinions. All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website but are not edited. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, spam, and links to outside websites will also be rejected. Please read our terms of service for full guides