Council halts mayor’s fire district veto
by By Kristal Dixon kdixon@cherokeetribune.com
August 04, 2012 01:53 AM | 1455 views | 6 6 comments | 12 12 recommendations | email to a friend | print
CANTON — Despite pleas and jeers from the audience, the Canton City Council overruled Mayor Gene Hobgood’s veto of an ordinance to create a fire district at a called council meeting Thursday night.

The vote to override the mayor’s veto stood at 5-1, with Councilman Glen Cummins opposing.

The council’s decision came after several residents once again spoke out in opposition to the ordinance, all of whom expressed concerns about the possibility of the city doing away with the present senior homestead exemption.

That belief, Council member John Beresford said, is “misinformation.”

He noted the ordinance was created in order to keep the city under control of its fire department.

Resident John Rust, who proclaimed at the meeting “there was no fire in Canton now,” said he didn’t understand why there’s “such a rush” to implement the ordinance with no plan in place.

Rust said he’d support allowing the creation of an ordinance to go out for a referendum for all voters to decide.

The creation of the ordinance for the district was originally floated by Council member Bob Rush, which is also viewed as an alternative to possibly consolidating fire services with Cherokee

County.

Official talks with the county have been placed on the backburner for now as the majority of the council is not interested in consolidation at this time.

Cummins, who voted against overriding the veto, said the council has not come forth with any specifics on what it plans to do now that the ordinance is in place.

“We need a plan,” he said. “There has been no plan presented as to how the city is going to do this.”

He added the ordinance would have an “extremely negative impact on less fortunate seniors.”

Beresford countered Cummins’ remarks, and reminded him there were six options he presented months ago to a fire services committee Hobgood appointed to review options to enhance fire protection.

He noted one of those proposals, consolidation with the county was, painted as being “dictatorial.”

He also said that as a council member, he has to represent not only the city’s senior citizens, but also those who are not seniors or who do not receive the senior homestead exemption.

Canton grants a $112,000 exemption on property for seniors age 62 or older. The person receiving the exemption must reside in the home.

As an example, a senior in Canton who owns a home valued at $300,000, assessed at 40 percent, or $120,000, would have the $112,000 homestead exemption applied, which would leave the property with $8,000 that can be taxed.

The city would then calculate the taxable portion with its 6.80 millage rate, resulting in the homeowner having a $54 tax bill.

As property values decline, some homeowners end up paying no property taxes.

Mayor Gene Hobgood said he has concerns about the legality of the removing the exemption, and noted he spoke with Georgia Attorney General Sam Olens, who he said had “concerns” about implementing the ordinance.

The mayor said Olens expressed hesitation about whether the district could be created and does what he believes would take away the homestead exemption.

Council Member Hooky Huffman said on Monday he offered for the city to consider two options: asking residents to consider approving a bond referendum to fund building two fire stations or use the district to solely fund the construction of the stations.

Huffman said his plan, which he noted will be the likely route the council will take, would leave the exemption in place.

Huffman added the city will continue funding fire services and operations in the city’s general fund budget.

Huffman said the millage rate for the district has not been determined.

The council member, who receives the senior homestead exemption, said he wants to stress to the city’s senior citizens that they will not lose their senior exemptions.

Huffman added believes he should have to pay more to shore up the city’s fire services.

“I’m ashamed to pay $50.23 for services I get,” he said, referring to his property tax bill. “I need to pay more. I should pay more than $50.23.”

The Canton City Council in other business:

* Had Mayor Gene Hobgood read a proclamation declaring Aug. 25 as Support Our Senior Citizens Day in the city;

* Reviewed a memorandum of understanding with Northside Hospital-Cherokee for use of the water tank on Lakeview Drive;

* Reviewed a proposal to accept the private streets of the Villas at RiverStone;

* Reviewed a request by the Cherokee County Board of Education to revert Academy Street between West Main Street and Archer Street to two-way traffic; and

* Heard a presentation from the Main Street Program on its strategy and tactics.

Comments
(6)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
taxmemoreplease?
|
August 04, 2012
Why not increase the senior exemption to a point it is revenue neutral with the new fire districts costs to seniors, or better yet, double it to $224K just to be sure.
Bill Bryan
|
August 04, 2012
Doing the right thing is not always the most popular thing. I am very proud of the majority of my fellow Canton City Councilmen. The truth will come out.
Truth Seeker
|
August 06, 2012
Mr. Bryan, with all due respect, you keep commenting that "the truth will come out." If you know "the truth," why don't you share it with the citizens of Canton or in the relevant context of a City Council Meeting? Or are you too busy trying to derail the Mayor? If you have the truth and are withholding it from the public, I suggest you question your integrity and ability to continue to serve your constituents. The citizens of Canton are tired of the games, name calling and bullying. We do not expect for all of you to agree on every issue, but we do request that you act professionally and maturely in your decision making process. So far, there is no evidence of this being a remote possibility. What happened to civil discourse? I am extremely disappointed in our city leaders and regret the votes I cast in the past. Lessons learned, but will our city survive this nonsense? I am beginning to doubt that it will. It's a sad day for all Canton citizens.
Fed Up
|
August 06, 2012
Whatever Mr. Bryan. First chance we have to get you and your cohorts out of there we will. No, I'm not a senior either but my parents are and can't afford this. There is absolutely no reason why the city shouldn't merge fire service with the county. NONE. It's more beneficial and provides better service all the way around. You and the council are not listening to the public on this one at all but only have your own agendas. Either we'll get you recalled or vote you out whichever can be done the quickest.
RECALLFORCANTON
|
August 06, 2012
Mr. Bryan...the truth is coming out and that truth is our council is unqualified with the exception of one or two. Turf wars....dating back even before the last election..still exist. One council member should have been recalled (Rush) when he started that Bob Rush for Mayor Business and "King Gene". This is disrespectful and unnecessary. You were right in the middle of that..where we always find you. In the middle of the controversy.

Unless you all can grow up and play like adults in the sandbox.....please step down and allow someone else who actually cares about the city to run it.

Hopefully, this newest fiasco will bring more things to light. But it looks like we lost another good policeman from the force at the hands of Mr. Wood and the council...where does it stop?
Bill Bryan
|
August 06, 2012
There is unanimous agreement among the Canton City Council members that at least two additional fire stations must be built. The first will be at or near Laurel Canyon and the second at Market Place. I am very pleased to report that as of this morning, all six Council members agree that the city is NOT going to "merge" with the county.

Thus far no funding decisions have been made. A myth has been floating around that the Senior Property Tax Exemption has been reduced or eliminated. This is simply not true. Nothing whatsoever has changed with the Exemption. There are several options on the table for funding the district, none of which touches the exemption. The Exemption was created by referendum and can be changed only by referendum.

In my opinion it would be reasonable for ALL property owners to pay something; most likely about $25 per year for a $50,000 house and $250 per year for a $500,000 house.

*We welcome your comments on the stories and issues of the day and seek to provide a forum for the community to voice opinions. All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website but are not edited. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, spam, and links to outside websites will also be rejected. Please read our terms of service for full guides