GOP split on Mitt Romney’s business practices
by Tom Raum
Associated Press Writer
January 11, 2012 11:34 PM | 594 views | 0 0 comments | 4 4 recommendations | email to a friend | print
WASHINGTON — What gives? Some of Mitt Romney’s rivals are waging a fierce attack that you’d never think would come from the mouths of Republicans who claim Ronald Reagan as their hero. They’re blasting the GOP front-runner for aggressive, wealth-creating business tactics.

The criticism, from former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, Texas Gov. Rick Perry and former Utah Gov. Jon Huntsman, didn’t seem to matter much in New Hampshire, where Romney claimed a comfortable primary victory. Huntsman came in a distant third, Gingrich was fourth and Perry was sixth.

But the sniping may have more resonance in next-in-line South Carolina, which is far more economically depressed, and in Florida. Both states are struggling with high joblessness and weak housing markets. South Carolina’s primary is Jan. 21, and Florida’s is Jan. 31.

Trying to tap into populist sentiment, Gingrich and the others are accusing Romney of being a fat-cat venture capitalist during his days running the private equity firm Bain Capital, laying off workers as he restructured companies and filled his own pockets.

A group backing Gingrich is airing TV ads in South Carolina showing distraught people who say they lost their jobs to Bain’s restructuring practices while Romney was at the helm.

The attacks are nearly identical to criticism once leveled at Romney by one of the nation’s best-known Democrats, Ted Kennedy, when Romney tried to claim Kennedy’s Massachusetts Senate seat in 1994. Whether that tactic helped or not, Kennedy, who died in 2009, did hold on to his seat.

To hear such accusations now from Republicans — historically the party of business and free enterprise — is particularly notable.

“It’s like watching dogs walk on their hind feet. It’s not impossible, but it certainly looks odd when you see it,” said economist Bruce Bartlett, who worked in the Republican administrations of Reagan and George H.W. Bush. “I don’t think they seriously believe there is anything wrong with what Romney did. I just think that they’re trying to use any card that they can find in the deck that might give them an edge. It’s simple expediency.”

Romney has shrugged off the fusillade.

“We understood for a long time that the Obama people would come after free enterprise.” he told reporters as he flew from New Hampshire to South Carolina on Wednesday. “We’re a little surprised to see Newt Gingrich as the first witness for the prosecution.”

Romney has repeatedly touted his business career as giving him the right credentials for dealing with a tough economy and the know-how to produce jobs. However, in the process of restructuring companies to make them more profitable, many workers indeed were laid off. The criticism from fellow Republicans now threatens to undercut Romney’s central argument that his private-sector experience best positions him to defeat Democratic President Barack Obama in the fall.

Gingrich, mounting the fiercest attacks, denies he’s arguing against capitalism.

“I am totally for capitalism. ... I do draw a distinction between (it) and looting a company,” says the former House speaker. He also asks, “Is capitalism really about the ability of a handful of rich people to manipulate the lives of thousands of other people and walk off with the money?”

Gingrich was a little more subdued on Wednesday. Without naming the former Massachusetts governor, Gingrich said at a campaign event in Rock Hill, S.C., that he wants “free enterprise that is honest. I want a free enterprise system that is accountable.”

Perry, meanwhile, who earlier called Romney a “vulture capitalist,” struck a defensive tone on Wednesday. At a stop outside Columbia, S.C., the Texas governor said, “I understand restructuring. I understand these types of things.” But, he added, “The idea that we can’t criticize someone for these get-rich-quick schemes is inappropriate from my perspective.”

Huntsman has asserted that “Governor. Romney enjoys firing people. I enjoy creating jobs.”

Says University of Virginia political scientist Larry Sabato: “Perry and Gingrich have already provided the video clips for Obama’s TV ads in the fall.”

The next two weeks are what Romney’s foes are interested in. Sabato said that Gingrich and the others have a better chance of making their criticism of Romney as a corporate predator stick in South Carolina because of the state’s high unemployment rate — most recently 9.9 percent — but that “it still will be tough.”

The Bain Capital attacks have opened a rift among Republicans, with many conservative groups and personalities urging Gingrich and the others to tone it down.

Conservative radio host Rush Limbaugh said Gingrich’s language was “out of bounds for those who value the free market.” Club for Growth President Chris Chocola called the attacks “disgusting.” Steve Judge, CEO of the Private Equity Growth Capital Council, cited “a lot of misinformation” from both parties ignoring benefits to the economy from firms such as Bain.

The harsh attacks on Romney reflect the tea party influence on GOP politics, residual anger against financial practices that led to the 2008 economic crisis and government bailouts and a widespread desire among conservative Republicans to find an alternative to Romney. They also come as the Republican Party becomes increasingly blue collar.

But one rising tea party star who has endorsed Romney, South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley, said she doesn’t like the criticism of his business practices. “It’s a sad day in South Carolina and across this country if Republicans are talking against the free market. Let me tell you that,” she said.

Romney was defended on Wednesday by Democrat Steven Rattner, a financier who helped lead the Obama administration’s bailout and restructuring of Chrysler and General Motors. He told MSNBC that, while he intends to vote for Obama, “I think these attacks are unfair. I think Mitt Romney not only had a very successful (business) caree, but Bain Capital is a terrific first-class firm managing money, mostly for endowments, for pension funds. ... And he did it in a perfectly honorable way.”

Ron Paul, who finished second in New Hampshire, and former Pennsylvania Sen. Rick Santorum, who finished fifth, have avoided slamming Romney for his Bain record.

Santorum told reporters he has no intention of depicting Romney’s business practices as “a liability. ... I believe in the private sector.” Paul told The Washington Times that “it astounds me” that Gingrich and the others would rip Romney’s work as a venture capitalist. “Either they are totally ignorant of economics, or if they know economics it’s just demagoguing for narrow political points.”

“It’s strange for Republicans to go after a colleague who’s successful in business. The arguments by Newt Gingrich could be made by the far left of the Democratic Party,” said James Thurber, a political scientist at American University.

Romney has said that, on balance, he took steps that led to the creation of 100,000 jobs.

However, that claim comes from activities concerning only three companies, all of them successes: Staples, Domino’s and Sports Authority. And it counts many jobs that were created after Romney left Bain in 1999. And it ignores job losses at many other firms that Bain invested in or took over.
Comments
(0)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
No Comments Yet
*We welcome your comments on the stories and issues of the day and seek to provide a forum for the community to voice opinions. All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website but are not edited. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, spam, and links to outside websites will also be rejected. Please read our terms of service for full guides