Voters await end of costly, negative election
by David Espo
Associated Press Writer
November 04, 2012 12:00 AM | 524 views | 0 0 comments | 6 6 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Supporters spell out ‘Ohio’ as they cheer for  Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney, not pictured, as he speaks during a campaign event on Friday in West Chester, Ohio.<br>The Associated Press
Supporters spell out ‘Ohio’ as they cheer for Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney, not pictured, as he speaks during a campaign event on Friday in West Chester, Ohio.
The Associated Press
slideshow
WASHINGTON — The White House, the Senate, the tea party revolution in the House and 11 governorships are on the line Tuesday in a fantastically costly, relentlessly negative election played out in unsettled economic times.

There is more at stake, though — the future of “Obamacare,” the fate of Medicare, too — in a land where the campaign tab is counted in the billions of dollars, where voters have been polled to the point of rebelliousness, and where a 4-year-old approached national hero status when she tearily protested the onslaught of campaign advertising.

“I’m tired of Bronco Bamma and Mitt Romney,” sobbed Abby Evans of Fort Collins, Colo., in a video that went viral in the campaign’s final, frantic days.

And why not? The rhetoric alone was cringe-inducing.

Democrats accused Romney of a “war on women.” Romney said President Barack Obama was waging a “war on coal.”

Plunging through a final weekend of campaigning, the two rivals honed their appeals as they flew from one battleground state to another.

“You want to know that your president means what he says and says what he means,” Obama told a crowd of 4,000 on Saturday in northeast Ohio, a reference to Romney’s late campaign commercials incorrectly suggesting that Jeep was creating jobs in China at the expense of domestic workers. “And after four years as president, you know me.”

Romney and his supporters projected confidence in Dubuque, Iowa. “Three more days,” they chanted as he stood on a stage adorned with a banner that read “Real Change.” Said Romney: “The president speaks well, but I have a plan” to restore the economy and create jobs.

Apart from the candidates, divided government — perhaps a politically correct term for dysfunctional government — is on the ballot after a two-year stretch that produced gridlock on many issues and record-low congressional approval ratings.

A victory by Democrat Obama would ensure the survival of the health care law that Republicans oppose so strongly, even if they win contested control of the Senate and, as expected, hold the House.

A triumph by Republican challenger Romney would slam the door on tax increases on the wealthy, even if Democrats demand them as the price for a deficit deal that includes curtailing the costs of programs such as Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security.

As well, the winner could wind up appointing one or more new justices to the Supreme Court, where four justices are older than 70. The potential exists to alter the balance of a tribunal that recently has issued 5-4 rulings on abortion, affirmative action, campaign finance and religion in public life.

The economy has trumped all other issues in a campaign carried out in the shadow of slow growth, high unemployment and huge federal deficits. Heading into the race’s final weekend, the government reported that 171,000 jobs were created in October. Unemployment ticked up to 7.9 percent.

“The question of this election is, ‘Do you want four years of the same or do you want real change?’” Romney asked an audience in West Allis, Wis., on Friday. He said, correctly, that unemployment is higher than when Obama took office, and he contended the president would fail to improve the economy with a second term. “Four more days,” his supported chanted.

Obama countered that more than 5 million jobs have been created since the depths of the Great Recession. He ended the campaign as he began it, insisting the election wasn’t a referendum on his performance in office, but a choice between him and his rival. It’s “between going back to the top-down policies that crashed our economy or adapting the kinds of policies that will make sure we’ve got a strong and growing middle class,” the incumbent said Friday in Hilliard, Ohio.
Comments
(0)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
No Comments Yet
*We welcome your comments on the stories and issues of the day and seek to provide a forum for the community to voice opinions. All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website but are not edited. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, spam, and links to outside websites will also be rejected. Please read our terms of service for full guides