Canton couple sues Duluth plant over hot manhole cover
December 26, 2013 01:00 PM | 2155 views | 1 1 comments | 18 18 recommendations | email to a friend | print
DULUTH, Minn. (AP) — A Georgia couple is suing Duluth's steam plant after they say their 2-year-old son received second-degree burns from a hot manhole cover.

Megan and Troy Brown, from Canton, Ga., are seeking more than $50,000 from the Duluth Steam Cooperative, according to the Duluth News Tribune.

The family was visiting Duluth for a wedding on Aug. 26, 2011, when they stopped for a photo in front of the Aerial Lift Bridge, according to the lawsuit. The boy, Jacob, tripped and fell on the manhole cover, leaving him with second-degree burns above his ankle, according to the suit.

"Who would ever think that a manhole cover would be in excess of 140 degrees?" Eden Prairie attorney Donald Mark said Monday outside a St. Louis County courtroom after a pretrial conference. "Nobody who lives in this city or visits this city should have to worry about getting burned by a manhole cover."

Jacobs was treated at an emergency room and months later underwent medical care at a burn center in Georgia.

The suit, filed Feb. 4, claims negligence, alleging Duluth Steam failed to take the proper steps to prevent the "dangerous condition created by the superheated manhole cover."

A trial date has been tentatively set for Jan. 7.

Steve Reyelts, who represents Duluth Steam, declined to comment, saying it would be inappropriate to discuss pending litigation. He has denied in court documents that Duluth Steam should be responsible for any damages.

The plant, which provides heating services to about 175 buildings, is operated by St. Paul-based Ever-Green Energy, which took over management last year from Duluth Steam, a cooperative that has since dissolved.

The city retains ownership of the utility, but pays Ever-Green just over $250,000 a year to operate the plant under a contract that runs through 2017.

___

Information from: Duluth News Tribune, http://www.duluthnewstribune.com



Copyright 2013 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Comments
(1)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
Vince Sutton
|
December 27, 2013
If the manhole cover manufacturer is responsible for the burns, then who was responsible for the child? Sounds like neglect to me....maybe take a little responsibility of your own PARENTS! Bad example for your kid.
*We welcome your comments on the stories and issues of the day and seek to provide a forum for the community to voice opinions. All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website but are not edited. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, spam, and links to outside websites will also be rejected. Please read our terms of service for full guides