Ethics committee again dismisses Cummins complaint
by Jessicah Peters
July 24, 2014 09:57 PM | 2742 views | 2 2 comments | 10 10 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Glen Cummins
Glen Cummins
slideshow
CANTON — The Canton Ethics Committee met again Wednesday to review a citizen’s complaint against present city manager and former Council member Glen Cummins. Mayor Gene Hobgood asked the committee to meet again after the initial meeting was not properly advertised.

The committee, which is made up of City Attorney Bobby Dyer and Council members Sandy McGrew and Jack Goodwin, dismissed the complaint unanimously, saying it was “moot” at the July 15 meeting made known to the public and media about an hour before it began.

On Wednesday, McGrew changed her decision and asked the complaint to be moved forward to the Ethics Board, which would have needed to be formed. Dyer said once again that since Cummins resigned from the council, the ethics board would no longer have jurisdiction over him and “the complaint should be dismissed as moot.”

“It would be the same as receiving an ethics complaint against anyone who is not on the council,” Dyer said. “And asking the ethics committee for an advisory opinion, which it has no authority to give.”

Canton resident Andrew Potts filed the complaint last month, claiming since Cummins was both a seated council member and acting city manager, he should not have been able to participate in the city manager selection process.

Cummins attended the meeting and said Thursday the committee took the proper action.

“The moving forward was a moot point, even though I would have welcomed the chance to prove how baseless the complaint was,” Cummins said. “Often citizens without all the facts form opinions that are later proved to be wrong and this was the case with Mr. Potts’ complaint. I was disappointed but not surprised by Council member McGrew’s flip flop on her opinion. But as I previously stated, my focus has been, and will continue to be, providing the city of Canton with the best possible performance as city manager.”

Dyer said the whole point of filing an ethics complaint is to punish the person in their status as a council member.

“He’s not a council member. There’s just nothing that can be done. I don’t think it’s fair to pass it on to another board and make them have to deal with it,” he said. “First, I can’t ask them to deal with something they don’t need to and second they might go forward with action when they shouldn’t. I think it would be wrong”

Goodwin said Cummins is neither elected nor appointed so the ethics complaint against him doesn’t apply. McGrew said it’s their job to discuss all avenues.

“This is what we discussed at the previous meeting, but since we’re meeting again, we need to turn every page,” McGrew said. “I understand Mr. Cummins is not an elected official, but I think it’s our job to talk about it and make sure we do the right thing.”

The vote was 2-1 to dismiss the complaint. Dyer asked City Clerk Susan Stanton to send a letter to Potts notifying him of the vote and dismissal.

Potts, who did not attend the first or second meeting, said he had no intention of attending the Wednesday meeting because he assumed they would dismiss it again. However, he still acknowledges the first meeting was in violation of the Georgia Open Meetings Act.

Georgia law says governing bodies of agencies may hold meetings besides those regularly scheduled, but they must provide notice to the public at least 24 hours beforehand. The government body must post a notice at the place of its regular meetings, and it must give written or oral notice to the local newspaper.

“I’m still acknowledging that it was an illegal meeting, and I plan on pursuing that with the state,” Potts said Thursday.

Comments
(2)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
Takes One to Know
|
July 25, 2014
Funny that Cummins is whining about McGrew's change of heart when he has become the King Flip Flopper on issues such as Fire Consolidation and countless other issues. Classic case of pot calling the kettle black!
Hey Jim
|
July 26, 2014
If you listened to why Cummins changed his stand on consolidation, you would understand that the current plan for the city fire department expansion will be the most cost effective for Canton's citizens. Even the county's CFO couldn't

make the numbers look more favorable for consolidation than for the city retaining its fire department, as hard as she might try.

What are the countless other issues? Please enlighten us.

Your personal enmity toward Cummins is getting the best of you. Guess you don't have anything better to do with your time than spew ugliness. What a shame!
*We welcome your comments on the stories and issues of the day and seek to provide a forum for the community to voice opinions. All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website but are not edited. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, spam, and links to outside websites will also be rejected. Please read our terms of service for full guides